6/29/2009

Vickery's Daily Express column

Posted by Phil Vickery - News |

WORDS can hardly express what we, the 2009 Lions, feel with the second Test – and with it the series against South Africa – snatched from us in the most distressing fashion.

The game in Pretoria was brutal to play in and, from an emotional point of view, just as difficult to watch.

Until those final desperate minutes, I had no doubt that the guys who went out to face down the Springboks had done enough to clinch victory.

I would go further and say that every one of those Lions who played in that match can be hugely proud of what he did in circumstances as demanding as any you could get on a rugby field, even including a World Cup final.

You expect effort. You expect spirit. But it went beyond either of these essential qualities. Everyone had to dig as deeply into himself as he had ever done for what became a test of will, as much as a test of strength.

So no messing around, no backing off – it was face to face and toe to toe. We were totally determined to stand up to the bullying tactics and physical threat always posed by the Boks.

This we did by giving back to them some of what they like to dish out to us or whoever their opponents are. Watching from the stand, I felt we more than matched them until, in their desperation, they came on so strongly in the second half.

This meant standing our ground and not falling prey to any cheap shots but also relying on the referee to sort out anything untoward. Then, though, there was the Schalk Burger incident with Luke Fitzgerald.

I have to say, from where I was I could not see what happened but I have heard plenty about it since. It is simple really – if Burger did what is alleged, he should have had a red card. If he did not, he would have been cleared by the disciplinary process anyway.

6/22/2009

Vickery's Daily Express Column

Posted by Phil Vickery - News |

I HAVE been through some experiences in my rugby life but it is fair to say what happened to me in the Lions scrum during our first Test was among the worst. To call it disappointing does not do it justice.

But putting my finger on exactly what went wrong, why I kept being penalised and why the Beast – Tendai Mtawarira, packing down opposite me – looked such a good scrummager I still have not worked out.

We could not get any stability into our scrum. The engagement with the South African pack did not go as we wanted or needed. And referee, Bryce Lawrence, took a distinct distaste to me, in particular.

Loads of people have asked me about it since the game and all I can say in reply is that until I go through the videotape of the match and look at all those scrums in minute detail I really will not know.

It is going to be an interesting session with Graham Rowntree, our scrum coach and a fine prop himself, when he and I were playing together for England. I do not expect to be spared. This needs to be put right.

I didn’t think it was any one thing. I had had a couple of bad scrums and then the referee made his decisions, which were against me and never the Beast. He was very adamant but I never really worked out what he wanted.

We could see then, and can see even more clearly in hindsight, the effect the scrummage battle had on the game. It is profoundly disappointing for me that my problems had such an adverse effect on everyone else. But I am not going to sit here and moan about the referee. I never have, never will. It has never been my style. One thing he did say was that I was driving up, that I was not square-on before the hit.

But I am not so sure. The contrast with all the games that have led to the Test was complete. Our scrummage has gone well and we thought we ought to be able to use it to our advantage. But we also knew that the Springbok scrum would be vastly better than some of the advance publicity had suggested.

All the talk about John Smit being a possible weak link I discounted. I know John very well and know what a fine player he is. Moving from hooker to tighthead is anyway easier for him, because he started out as a prop.

Then there is the Beast. As I know to my cost, Tendai is a very strong man, a prop who has developed very rapidly over the past seven months since he played with South Africa at Twickenham last November.

I was so pleased and proud to be selected for this Test. Even at this senior stage of my career I do not think I had ever felt so nervous. Perhaps that reflected in the way I played.

I am realistic enough to know my place must be at risk for the second Test in Pretoria. What happened in Durban is bound to make it harder for me but I am big enough and honest enough to take that on the chin if it happens. There were plenty of disappointed guys when the
first team was read out and there will be others experiencing such emotions when it happens for the second Test. Not forgetting we have a game with the Emerging Springboks tomorrow.

If I do not make it, it is important everyone realises I will not be going around moping or sapping other people’s energy. I will be doing absolutely everything I can to help those who have been chosen. We are all in this together.

What’s more, I give the Lions a serious chance in the second Test. The last time I was involved in a Lions tour, in Australia in 2001, we were 1-0 up and everyone was saying the Wallabies would never get back into it.

I hardly need reminding that they won the last two Tests and took the series. So nothing is pre-ordained, and there is no basis to the theory that if the Lions lost the first Test they could not win the series.

6/22/2009

My place is in jeopardy - Vickery

Posted by Phil Vickery - News |

Gloucester Citizen column 22/06/09

PHIL VICKERY says his selection for the second Test against South Africa on Saturday in Pretoria could be in question following his performance against the world champions.

The Lions narrowly lost 26-21 in the three-Test match series opener in Durban after the former Gloucester tight-head prop was given a torrid time in the scrum by the Springboks' Tendal Mtawarira.

The 33-year-old has thrown his battered body into thousands of scrums over a long career, but he was left baffled by decisions of New Zealand referee Bryce Lawrence.

On two occasions Vickery was penalised in his own half, which led to the hosts adding another vital six points to their tally.

After being hauled off five minutes into the second period following a heated conversation with the match official at the break, Vickery says he will accept whatever decision head coach Ian McGeechan now makes.

"It is strange because I had a couple of bad scrums but he (the referee) was saying about not boring in with the shoulder and not going around the outside, but I don't know," said Vickery, who lives in Gloucestershire.

"It is difficult to judge, but you have just got to take that and whatever the repercussions of that will be, you have just got to get on with it.

"If I am not selected for next week then that's life, you have to move on with it. You have to worry about that when the guys announce the team.

"But I am not going to get down about it. I am disappointed with my performance, but it is about the team.

"Whatever happens for next Saturday I have to make sure I do everything I can to make sure the team is successful whether I am involved or not."

Vickery's captain Paul O'Connell backed his team-mate.

"Bryce said that Phil was constantly boring in," he said. "I didn't think so but it is hard to see.

"Phil is a very experienced player and how he was seen to be making the same mistake four or five times in a row is beyond me."

McGeechan will take the matter up with International Rugby Board referees chief Paddy O'Brien as part of the official protocol before the second Test.

Subscribe